Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Europe · IRL

Ireland

Baseline index 12.08Rank 28 of 197EstablishedEuropeAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Anchors. Absorb most shocks and take most of the upside. One of 42 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years8.4rank 162 of 197 · 3 years: 9.1
Worst case−6.1%Energy supply shock · tail −5.6%
Opportunity · 10 years+21.1rank 23 of 197 · 3 years: +22.0
Best case+46100-day pandemic defence · gainer in 6 of 10
Shock absorbed47%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.41expected index points from best practice
Breadth14 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkAdvanced Materials & Manufacturingweakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Chokepoint closure, Geoeconomic confrontation. Highest exposure indicators: few months of imports covered by reserves; trade in goods and services relative to gdp; internet users as a share of population; share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; refugees hosted per head of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Ireland’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Energy supply shock S09High 0.92−0.74−1.19−0.52▼ 221Energy Technologies 3.1 · Nascent
Pandemic S14High 0.84−0.66−1.30−0.57019Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.7 · Transitional
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.82−0.64−0.97−0.42▼ 223Maritime Power 2.4 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.73−0.63−1.05−0.46017Sensing, Timing & Navigation 3.5 · Nascent
Geoeconomic confrontation S01High 0.86−0.60−1.22−0.53▼ 117Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 6.4 · Foundational
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.84−0.55−1.15−0.49018Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 6.8 · Foundational
Global financial crisis S03High 0.79−0.54−1.17−0.51▼ 119Economic Output & Productivity 11.4 · Transitional
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.90−0.50−0.91−0.40▼ 116Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 6.2 · Foundational
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.55−0.38−0.60−0.26▼ 112Air Power 1.7 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.50−0.33−0.71−0.31012Energy Infrastructure 9.1 · Transitional
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.56−0.22−0.50−0.22▲ 19Water, Sanitation & Waste Infrastructure 12.4 · Established
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.45−0.21−0.46−0.19▲ 19Force Generation & Mobilisation 6.7 · Foundational
Disaster in the core S10Low 0.31−0.15−0.34−0.15▲ 28Energy Infrastructure 9.3 · Transitional
Food and water shock S11Low 0.20−0.13−0.26−0.11▲ 19Resource Infrastructure 7 · Foundational

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Energy supply shock−0.17−1.03−0.39−0.43−0.43−0.97−1.15−1.11−0.98
Pandemic−0.70−0.35−0.29−0.85−0.75−0.80−0.75−0.73−0.73
Chokepoint closure−0.08−1.06−0.89·−0.47−1.02−0.41−0.81−1.05
Infrastructure collapse−0.78−0.91−0.32−0.32−0.32−0.81−0.76−0.74−0.65
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.77−0.32−0.29·−0.75−0.72−0.75−0.73−1.10
AI diffusion shock−0.72−0.30−0.27−0.80−0.60−0.82−0.70−0.39−0.34
Global financial crisis−0.27−0.27−0.24−0.54−0.54−0.68−0.90−0.77−0.62
Single-supplier cut-off−0.96−0.26−0.33−0.41·−0.83·−0.85−0.85
Hybrid campaign−0.29−0.63−0.68·−0.70−0.65·−0.26−0.26
Sovereign funding crisis−0.03−0.27−0.15−0.38−0.34−0.47−0.57−0.34−0.39
Mass displacement·−0.23−0.17−0.47−0.38−0.52−0.22−0.03·
Legitimacy crisis−0.15·−0.30−0.15−0.36−0.49−0.41··
Disaster in the core−0.01−0.31−0.09−0.23−0.10−0.26−0.14−0.10−0.10
Food and water shock−0.01−0.15−0.07−0.18−0.17−0.18−0.09−0.15−0.17

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Ireland is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+46.448.01.66220Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11 · Transitional
Great-power détente S18 ↗Gainer+43.552.28.7666Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 12.3 · Established
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+40.540.60.14322Energy Technologies 4.8 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+31.532.20.75622Energy Infrastructure 9.8 · Transitional
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Gainer+23.437.514.25321Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 8 · Foundational
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Gainer+12.730.317.66332Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11 · Transitional
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+6.511.55.06042Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 9.6 · Transitional
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed−1.013.114.159159Energy Infrastructure 9.8 · Transitional
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed−1.84.26.061110Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11 · Transitional
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed−4.00.94.975182Health System Capability 14.7 · Established