Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Europe · POL

Poland

Baseline index 12.39Rank 25 of 197EstablishedEuropeAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Anchors. Absorb most shocks and take most of the upside. One of 42 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years8.5rank 160 of 197 · 3 years: 9.0
Worst case−5.1%Energy supply shock · tail −5.0%
Opportunity · 10 years+17.0rank 28 of 197 · 3 years: +17.3
Best case+51Energy abundance · gainer in 5 of 10
Shock absorbed48%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.34expected index points from best practice
Breadth7 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Hybrid campaign, Energy supply shock, AI diffusion shock. Highest exposure indicators: land border with russia or belarus; share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; refugees hosted per head of population; internet users as a share of population; share of population aged 65 and over.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Poland’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Pandemic S14High 0.79−0.64−1.22−0.53▼ 116Biotechnology & Health Technologies 10 · Transitional
Energy supply shock S09High 0.89−0.63−1.15−0.50▼ 214Energy Technologies 7.9 · Foundational
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.80−0.58−1.10−0.48012Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 4.9 · Nascent
Global financial crisis S03High 0.72−0.55−1.07−0.47▼ 115Investment Attraction & Projection 11.6 · Transitional
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.68−0.52−0.98−0.43011Sensing, Timing & Navigation 9.1 · Transitional
Hybrid campaign S06High 0.93−0.51−1.03−0.45▼ 214Maritime Power 7.4 · Foundational
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.75−0.48−0.89−0.39▼ 111Maritime Power 7.5 · Foundational
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.58−0.44−0.82−0.36▼ 17Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 5.2 · Nascent
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.79−0.41−0.80−0.35▼ 111Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 5 · Nascent
Mass displacement S08High 0.76−0.33−0.67−0.29▼ 110Health System Capability 11.9 · Transitional
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.35−0.27−0.51−0.2204Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 10 · Transitional
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.44−0.24−0.45−0.1907Justice System & Fundamental Rights 11.6 · Transitional
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.40−0.21−0.44−0.19▲ 14Energy Infrastructure 10.9 · Transitional
Food and water shock S11Low 0.27−0.18−0.36−0.1604Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 11.3 · Transitional

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Pandemic−0.68−0.34−0.28−0.82−0.72−0.77−0.72−0.70−0.70
Energy supply shock−0.15−0.88−0.33−0.37−0.37−0.82−0.97−0.94−0.83
AI diffusion shock−0.76−0.32−0.28−0.84−0.63−0.87−0.74−0.41−0.36
Global financial crisis−0.28−0.28−0.25−0.55−0.55−0.69−0.92−0.79−0.63
Infrastructure collapse−0.65−0.76−0.27−0.27−0.27−0.68−0.64−0.62−0.54
Hybrid campaign−0.38−0.83−0.90·−0.92−0.87·−0.35−0.35
Chokepoint closure−0.06−0.78−0.66·−0.35−0.75−0.30−0.60−0.77
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.56−0.23−0.21·−0.54−0.52−0.54−0.53−0.80
Single-supplier cut-off−0.78−0.21−0.27−0.33·−0.68·−0.69−0.69
Mass displacement·−0.34−0.25−0.68−0.56−0.77−0.33−0.04·
Sovereign funding crisis−0.03−0.23−0.13−0.31−0.28−0.39−0.47−0.28−0.32
Legitimacy crisis−0.17·−0.35−0.17−0.40−0.56−0.46··
Disaster in the core−0.01−0.44−0.13−0.33−0.15−0.37−0.20−0.15−0.15
Food and water shock−0.02−0.21−0.09−0.25−0.24−0.26−0.12−0.21−0.24

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Poland is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+51.151.30.25616Energy Technologies 9.4 · Transitional
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+41.743.41.76025Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11.2 · Transitional
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+37.338.20.96214Energy Infrastructure 11.5 · Transitional
Great-power détente S18 ↗Gainer+15.632.817.26242Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 11.8 · Transitional
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Gainer+13.230.717.44528Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 6.2 · Foundational
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed+8.733.925.26049Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11.2 · Transitional
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+5.913.27.36045Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 10.8 · Transitional
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed+1.08.07.06092Biotechnology & Health Technologies 11.2 · Transitional
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed−1.312.914.262162Energy Infrastructure 11.5 · Transitional
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed−2.14.16.263165Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 12 · Established