Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Europe · PRT

Portugal

Baseline index 11.68Rank 31 of 197TransitionalEuropeAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Anchors. Absorb most shocks and take most of the upside. One of 42 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years8.4rank 164 of 197 · 3 years: 8.5
Worst case−6.1%Energy supply shock · tail −5.7%
Opportunity · 10 years+15.4rank 30 of 197 · 3 years: +15.9
Best case+43Energy abundance · gainer in 4 of 10
Shock absorbed46%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.40expected index points from best practice
Breadth14 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Global financial crisis, AI diffusion shock. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; public debt relative to gdp; share of population aged 65 and over; internet users as a share of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Portugal’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Energy supply shock S09High 0.91−0.71−1.18−0.51▼ 312Energy Technologies 5 · Nascent
Pandemic S14High 0.81−0.67−1.26−0.55016Biotechnology & Health Technologies 8.3 · Foundational
Global financial crisis S03High 0.82−0.62−1.22−0.53013Economic Output & Productivity 10.3 · Transitional
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.82−0.60−1.13−0.49011Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 3.5 · Nascent
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.71−0.59−1.02−0.45▲ 115Sensing, Timing & Navigation 5 · Nascent
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.77−0.53−0.91−0.40014Resource Infrastructure 6.9 · Foundational
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.58−0.45−0.82−0.36010Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 3.9 · Nascent
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.58−0.43−0.83−0.3705Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 10.1 · Transitional
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.65−0.38−0.65−0.29012Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 3.7 · Nascent
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.53−0.34−0.58−0.2607Sensing, Timing & Navigation 5.7 · Nascent
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.57−0.29−0.62−0.27▲ 12Energy Infrastructure 10.4 · Transitional
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.48−0.24−0.49−0.21▲ 15Force Generation & Mobilisation 10.6 · Transitional
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.49−0.21−0.43−0.19▲ 12Labour & Employment 12.6 · Established
Food and water shock S11Low 0.18−0.12−0.24−0.11▲ 12Resource Infrastructure 8 · Foundational

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Energy supply shock−0.16−0.99−0.37−0.41−0.41−0.93−1.10−1.06−0.94
Pandemic−0.72−0.36−0.29−0.87−0.76−0.81−0.76−0.74−0.74
Global financial crisis−0.31−0.31−0.28−0.62−0.62−0.78−1.04−0.89−0.71
AI diffusion shock−0.78−0.33−0.29−0.87−0.65−0.89−0.76−0.42−0.37
Infrastructure collapse−0.73−0.85−0.30−0.30−0.30−0.76−0.71−0.70−0.61
Chokepoint closure−0.07−0.88−0.74·−0.39−0.84−0.34−0.67−0.87
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.58−0.24−0.22·−0.56−0.54−0.56−0.55−0.83
Sovereign funding crisis−0.05−0.36−0.20−0.50−0.45−0.62−0.75−0.45−0.51
Single-supplier cut-off−0.72−0.19−0.25−0.31·−0.63·−0.64−0.64
Hybrid campaign−0.25−0.55−0.59·−0.61−0.57·−0.23−0.23
Disaster in the core−0.02−0.61−0.18−0.45−0.20−0.51−0.27−0.20−0.20
Legitimacy crisis−0.18·−0.36−0.18−0.41−0.58−0.47··
Mass displacement·−0.21−0.16−0.43−0.35−0.48−0.20−0.03·
Food and water shock−0.01−0.14−0.06−0.17−0.16−0.17−0.08−0.14−0.16

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Portugal is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+43.346.02.64719Energy Technologies 6.6 · Foundational
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+40.842.41.65627Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.6 · Transitional
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+33.735.92.26119Energy Infrastructure 11.3 · Transitional
Great-power détente S18 ↗Gainer+21.932.210.36026Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 11.5 · Transitional
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Mixed+9.128.319.24230Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 4.8 · Nascent
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+5.711.96.25648Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 9 · Transitional
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+2.48.35.968111Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 13 · Established
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+2.211.99.761141Energy Infrastructure 11.3 · Transitional
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed+0.37.77.45795Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.6 · Transitional
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed−0.825.326.15793Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.6 · Transitional