Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Russia and Eurasia · RUS

Russia

Baseline index 12.30Rank 26 of 197EstablishedRussia and EurasiaAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on both: neither badly hit nor well placed. One of 43 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Insulated over 10 years: lower vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years4.4rank 189 of 197 · 3 years: 4.0
Worst case−4.4%AI diffusion shock · tail −4.1%
Opportunity · 10 years−3.2rank 104 of 197 · 3 years: −2.9
Best case+23100-day pandemic defence · gainer in 2 of 10
Shock absorbed46%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.22expected index points from best practice
Breadth1 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkPolitical Institutions & Civic Participationweakest point in 5 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: AI diffusion shock, Geoeconomic confrontation, Legitimacy crisis. Highest exposure indicators: oil, gas and coal among the top five exports of a net exporter; land border with russia or belarus; internet users as a share of population; earthquake, storm, flood, drought and volcanic hazards named for the nation; share of population aged 65 and over; urban share of population; consumer price inflation.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Russia’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.69−0.54−0.95−0.41012Political Institutions & Civic Participation 3.5 · Nascent
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.75−0.51−1.09−0.46011Financial Stability & Crisis Management 9.6 · Transitional
Pandemic S14Medium 0.58−0.47−0.91−0.39▲ 110Population Health 9.1 · Transitional
Disaster in the core S10High 0.73−0.43−0.80−0.35▼ 113Health System Capability 10.5 · Transitional
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.48−0.36−0.50−0.2108Political Institutions & Civic Participation 3.6 · Nascent
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.38−0.30−0.54−0.24▲ 16Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 7.5 · Foundational
Global financial crisis S03Low 0.31−0.28−0.47−0.20▲ 16Political Institutions & Civic Participation 4.1 · Nascent
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.52−0.26−0.53−0.22▲ 14Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 7.4 · Foundational
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.42−0.21−0.38−0.17▲ 15Political Institutions & Civic Participation 4 · Nascent
Sovereign funding crisis S04Low 0.21−0.19−0.30−0.1305Political Institutions & Civic Participation 4.3 · Nascent
Food and water shock S11Low 0.24−0.17−0.31−0.1404Population Health 9.6 · Transitional
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.30−0.14−0.34−0.14▲ 14Internal Security & Order 9.9 · Transitional
Energy supply shock S09Low 0.16−0.10−0.21−0.09▲ 35Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 11.3 · Transitional
Chokepoint closure S05Low 0.12−0.06−0.15−0.06▲ 34Trade Facilitation & Logistics 11.8 · Transitional

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
AI diffusion shock−0.70−0.29−0.29−0.78−0.58−0.80−0.68−0.38−0.33
Infrastructure collapse−0.63−0.74−0.29−0.26−0.26−0.66−0.61−0.60−0.53
Pandemic−0.50−0.25−0.23−0.60−0.53−0.56−0.53−0.52−0.52
Disaster in the core−0.03−0.89−0.30−0.66−0.30−0.74−0.40−0.30−0.30
Legitimacy crisis−0.26·−0.57−0.26−0.60−0.84−0.69··
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.38−0.16−0.16·−0.37−0.36−0.37−0.36−0.54
Global financial crisis−0.14−0.14−0.14−0.28−0.28−0.34−0.46−0.39−0.31
Single-supplier cut-off−0.50−0.14−0.19−0.22·−0.44·−0.44−0.44
Mass displacement·−0.21−0.17−0.42−0.34−0.47−0.20−0.02·
Sovereign funding crisis−0.02−0.15−0.10−0.21−0.19−0.26−0.32−0.19−0.22
Food and water shock−0.02−0.19−0.10−0.24−0.22−0.24−0.11−0.19−0.22
Hybrid campaign−0.11−0.23−0.27·−0.26−0.24·−0.10−0.10
Energy supply shock−0.02−0.14−0.06−0.06−0.06−0.13−0.16−0.15−0.14
Chokepoint closure−0.01−0.10−0.10·−0.05−0.10−0.04−0.08−0.10

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Russia is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+22.932.910.05654Population Health 10 · Transitional
Great-power détente S18 ↗Gainer+22.029.97.95425Investment Attraction & Projection 10 · Transitional
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed+5.535.029.55557Population Health 10 · Transitional
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed−0.214.514.756154Investment Attraction & Projection 10 · Transitional
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Mixed−0.424.524.85047Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 8.2 · Foundational
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed−1.20.92.137157Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 5 · Nascent
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Loser−10.914.024.942156Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 5 · Nascent
Yield revolution S22 ↗Loser−19.88.027.858186Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 11 · Transitional
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Loser−28.010.038.059178Internal Security & Order 10.3 · Transitional
Energy abundance S16 ↗Loser−35.67.242.760167Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 11 · Transitional