Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Indo-Pacific · KIR

Kiribati

Baseline index 2.21Rank 186 of 197InceptionIndo-PacificAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Acute fragility. Every scenario is severe; there is little capability left to lose. One of 13 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years59.2rank 9 of 197 · 3 years: 58.2
Worst case−42.6%Energy supply shock · tail −39.8%
Opportunity · 10 years−11.3rank 164 of 197 · 3 years: −10.9
Best case+6Middle East settlement · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed10%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+1.27expected index points from best practice
Breadth5 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkAdvanced Materials & Manufacturingweakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, AI diffusion shock, Chokepoint closure. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; adult obesity rate; internet users as a share of population; low real gdp per head; consumer price inflation; low life expectancy at birth; staple foods among the top five imports.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Kiribati’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Energy supply shock S09High 0.91−0.94−1.01−0.48▼ 114Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.83−0.85−0.93−0.42▼ 314Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.94−0.84−0.90−0.44▼ 311Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Pandemic S14High 0.68−0.81−0.91−0.41▼ 116Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03High 0.64−0.78−0.86−0.39▼ 113Economic Output & Productivity 0 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.68−0.75−0.80−0.37015Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Food and water shock S11High 0.67−0.73−0.84−0.37015Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.58−0.63−0.70−0.31▼ 19Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.44−0.55−0.62−0.28▲ 413Financial Stability & Crisis Management 0.8 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.57−0.49−0.59−0.26014Energy Infrastructure 0.7 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.64−0.45−0.53−0.25▲ 28Force Generation & Mobilisation 0 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.60−0.43−0.46−0.21▲ 18Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.37−0.31−0.34−0.16▼ 18Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Low 0.26−0.18−0.22−0.10▲ 49Labour & Employment 2.8 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Energy supply shock−0.04−1.12−0.30−0.62−0.62−1.40−1.63−1.32−1.39
AI diffusion shock−0.08−0.53−0.28−1.46−1.10−1.54−1.31−0.72−0.64
Chokepoint closure−0.04−1.28−0.38·−0.75−1.62−0.65−1.25−1.61
Pandemic−0.08−0.49−0.25−1.22−0.98−1.14−1.07−1.04−1.04
Global financial crisis−0.08−0.42−0.24−0.86−0.86−1.08−1.44−1.17−0.88
Infrastructure collapse−0.08−1.19−0.25−0.47−0.47−1.17−1.09−1.05−0.94
Food and water shock−0.04−0.74−0.24−1.07−1.02−1.09−0.51−0.87−1.00
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.08−0.39−0.22·−0.92−0.88−0.92−0.90−1.35
Sovereign funding crisis−0.04−0.46−0.18−0.65−0.59−0.81−0.98−0.59−0.67
Disaster in the core−0.04−1.00−0.21−0.78−0.35−0.88−0.47−0.35−0.35
Legitimacy crisis−0.08·−0.33−0.40−0.89−1.29−1.06··
Single-supplier cut-off−0.08−0.26−0.23−0.46·−0.93·−0.94−0.94
Hybrid campaign−0.05−0.60−0.32·−0.69−0.65·−0.26−0.26
Mass displacement·−0.19−0.10−0.39−0.32−0.44−0.19−0.02·

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Kiribati is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed+6.38.32.114106Energy Infrastructure 2.1 · Inception
Energy abundance S16 ↗Mixed+5.76.60.87114Energy Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+4.77.32.610123Investment Attraction & Projection 1 · Inception
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed+0.94.94.08139Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed−0.43.74.117150Financial Regulation & Integrity 2.5 · Inception
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed−9.65.915.69150Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Yield revolution S22 ↗Loser−12.55.017.57161Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Loser−19.57.226.79169Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Great-power détente S18 ↗Loser−29.23.532.78195Investment Attraction & Projection 1 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−41.03.944.95186Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception