Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Indo-Pacific · FSM

Micronesia

Baseline index 2.33Rank 182 of 197InceptionIndo-PacificAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Acute fragility. Every scenario is severe; there is little capability left to lose. One of 13 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years52.2rank 15 of 197 · 3 years: 52.8
Worst case−40.7%Energy supply shock · tail −37.8%
Opportunity · 10 years−11.5rank 165 of 197 · 3 years: −11.0
Best case+8Middle East settlement · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed10%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+1.19expected index points from best practice
Breadth4 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkAdvanced Materials & Manufacturingweakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Chokepoint closure, Global financial crisis. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; staple foods among the top five imports; adult obesity rate; low real gdp per head.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Micronesia’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Energy supply shock S09High 0.90−0.95−1.02−0.48▼ 215Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
Food and water shock S11High 0.79−0.85−0.97−0.44▼ 316Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.93−0.84−0.92−0.44▼ 312Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03High 0.64−0.81−0.88−0.40▼ 313Economic Output & Productivity 0 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.70−0.73−0.81−0.36▼ 312Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01High 0.65−0.70−0.77−0.35▼ 49Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Pandemic S14Medium 0.58−0.70−0.79−0.35▼ 212Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12Medium 0.41−0.47−0.51−0.23▲ 112Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.62−0.44−0.53−0.24▲ 18Force Generation & Mobilisation 0 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.50−0.43−0.52−0.23012Energy Infrastructure 1.4 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.57−0.41−0.45−0.20▼ 27Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Low 0.33−0.41−0.46−0.20▲ 411Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 0.7 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.30−0.26−0.28−0.13▼ 15Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Low 0.26−0.18−0.22−0.10▲ 29Labour & Employment 2.8 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Energy supply shock−0.04−1.17−0.31−0.62−0.62−1.39−1.62−1.35−1.41
Food and water shock−0.04−0.85−0.27−1.25−1.19−1.28−0.60−1.02−1.17
Chokepoint closure−0.04−1.31−0.41·−0.73−1.57−0.63−1.22−1.62
Global financial crisis−0.11−0.43−0.24−0.88−0.88−1.10−1.46−1.18−0.99
AI diffusion shock−0.11−0.46−0.26−1.27−0.95−1.31−1.11−0.61−0.54
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.11−0.43−0.24·−1.02−0.99−1.02−1.00−1.44
Pandemic−0.11−0.42−0.22−1.02−0.90−0.96−0.90−0.88−0.88
Infrastructure collapse−0.11−0.77−0.18−0.28−0.28−0.71−0.66−0.65−0.57
Legitimacy crisis−0.11·−0.35−0.38−0.88−1.23−1.01··
Disaster in the core−0.03−0.88−0.18−0.69−0.31−0.77−0.41−0.31−0.31
Single-supplier cut-off−0.11−0.25−0.22−0.44·−0.88·−0.90−0.90
Sovereign funding crisis−0.04−0.35−0.13−0.49−0.44−0.60−0.73−0.44−0.50
Hybrid campaign−0.06−0.48−0.31·−0.55−0.51·−0.20−0.20
Mass displacement·−0.19−0.10−0.39−0.32−0.44−0.19−0.02·

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Micronesia is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed+7.79.82.11692Energy Infrastructure 2.6 · Inception
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+6.19.02.913108Investment Attraction & Projection 1.7 · Inception
Energy abundance S16 ↗Mixed+5.96.70.97112Energy Technologies 0.4 · Inception
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed+0.34.34.08147Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed−1.72.54.117160Financial Regulation & Integrity 2.5 · Inception
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed−9.35.915.29144Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Yield revolution S22 ↗Loser−12.35.317.67160Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Loser−22.86.229.19177Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Great-power détente S18 ↗Loser−27.55.032.510194Export Capability & Sophistication 1.3 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−43.73.347.15193Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception