Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Indo-Pacific · PNG

Papua New Guinea

Baseline index 3.80Rank 151 of 197NascentIndo-PacificAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Fuel-dependent. Budgets built on oil and gas: the upside scenarios are their downside. One of 15 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years24.6rank 73 of 197 · 3 years: 26.1
Worst case−18.4%Global financial crisis · tail −16.8%
Opportunity · 10 years−13.1rank 174 of 197 · 3 years: −11.7
Best case+8Emerging-market breakout · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed17%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.85expected index points from best practice
Breadth4 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkAdvanced Materials & Manufacturingweakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Global financial crisis, Geoeconomic confrontation, AI diffusion shock. Highest exposure indicators: oil, gas and coal among the top five exports of a net exporter; industry as a share of gdp; share of population aged under 15; low real gdp per head; low life expectancy at birth.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Papua New Guinea’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.59−0.70−0.86−0.38▲ 416Business Dynamism & Entrepreneurship 2.1 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.57−0.61−0.74−0.33▼ 313Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13Medium 0.54−0.60−0.68−0.31▲ 414Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.51−0.59−0.73−0.32▲ 915Energy Infrastructure 2.8 · Inception
Pandemic S14Medium 0.45−0.58−0.67−0.30▲ 713Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10High 0.63−0.56−0.68−0.30▼ 313Energy Infrastructure 2.5 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.78−0.55−0.67−0.31▼ 312Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Food and water shock S11Medium 0.48−0.52−0.63−0.28▲ 413Water, Sanitation & Waste Infrastructure 2.8 · Inception
Energy supply shock S09Medium 0.39−0.40−0.49−0.22▲ 127Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05Medium 0.42−0.39−0.49−0.22▲ 88Joint Command, Projection & Sustainment 1.8 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12Low 0.33−0.39−0.45−0.20▲ 127Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.44−0.34−0.43−0.19▲ 98Information Environment & Strategic Communication 2 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.28−0.25−0.30−0.13▼ 29Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Low 0.30−0.21−0.26−0.11▲ 16Health System Capability 3.6 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Global financial crisis−0.24−0.36−0.32−0.72−0.72−0.90−1.20−1.02−0.82
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.39−0.35−0.32·−0.82−0.79−0.82−0.80−1.21
AI diffusion shock−0.39−0.36−0.32−0.96−0.72−0.99−0.84−0.46−0.41
Sovereign funding crisis−0.06−0.49−0.28−0.68−0.62−0.85−1.03−0.62−0.70
Pandemic−0.41−0.32−0.26−0.78−0.68−0.73−0.68−0.66−0.66
Disaster in the core−0.04−1.15−0.35−0.86−0.38−0.96−0.51−0.38−0.38
Single-supplier cut-off−0.46−0.33−0.42−0.52·−1.06·−1.07−1.07
Food and water shock−0.06−0.59−0.26−0.72−0.69−0.73−0.34−0.59−0.67
Energy supply shock−0.06−0.57−0.21−0.24−0.24−0.53−0.63−0.61−0.54
Chokepoint closure−0.05−0.64−0.55·−0.29−0.62−0.25−0.50−0.64
Infrastructure collapse−0.32−0.61−0.22−0.22−0.22−0.54−0.50−0.49−0.43
Legitimacy crisis−0.18·−0.52−0.26−0.60−0.84−0.69··
Hybrid campaign−0.14−0.42−0.46·−0.47−0.44·−0.18−0.18
Mass displacement·−0.22−0.16−0.44−0.36−0.50−0.21−0.03·

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Papua New Guinea is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+7.916.88.92290Energy Infrastructure 4 · Nascent
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+3.77.43.72493Health System Capability 4.3 · Nascent
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed+0.74.64.012142Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed−4.79.714.313103Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1 · Inception
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed−7.18.415.513131Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed−9.98.918.913129Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Great-power détente S18 ↗Loser−19.510.630.122182Export Capability & Sophistication 4 · Nascent
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−24.84.329.18133Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Loser−33.56.940.423184Energy Infrastructure 4 · Nascent
Energy abundance S16 ↗Loser−67.53.070.511188Energy Technologies 0.6 · Inception