Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Indo-Pacific · SGP

Singapore

Baseline index 15.20Rank 10 of 197AdvancedIndo-PacificAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Anchors. Absorb most shocks and take most of the upside. One of 42 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years5.3rank 183 of 197 · 3 years: 5.5
Worst case−4.3%Energy supply shock · tail −4.1%
Opportunity · 10 years+32.1rank 6 of 197 · 3 years: +32.0
Best case+67100-day pandemic defence · gainer in 8 of 10
Shock absorbed59%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.15expected index points from best practice
Breadth13 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkResource Infrastructureweakest point in 4 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Chokepoint closure, Geoeconomic confrontation. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; urban share of population; public debt relative to gdp; trade in goods and services relative to gdp; internet users as a share of population; little renewable water per head.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Singapore’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Energy supply shock S09High 0.94−0.65−1.21−0.49▼ 218Resource Infrastructure 7.2 · Foundational
Chokepoint closure S05High 1.00−0.62−1.18−0.50▼ 216Resource Infrastructure 7.2 · Foundational
Pandemic S14High 0.94−0.57−1.45−0.56014Information Environment & Strategic Communication 13.2 · Established
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.84−0.55−1.22−0.49016Energy Infrastructure 8.5 · Foundational
Geoeconomic confrontation S01High 0.86−0.46−1.22−0.45011Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 12.2 · Established
Global financial crisis S03High 0.95−0.46−1.42−0.46012Political Institutions & Civic Participation 10.1 · Transitional
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.87−0.41−1.20−0.41012Political Institutions & Civic Participation 10.1 · Transitional
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.77−0.34−0.78−0.3109Resource Infrastructure 8.2 · Foundational
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.56−0.26−0.80−0.2609Energy Infrastructure 9.1 · Transitional
Disaster in the core S10High 0.60−0.23−0.65−0.23010Energy Infrastructure 9 · Transitional
Food and water shock S11Medium 0.43−0.21−0.56−0.19▼ 19Resource Infrastructure 8.3 · Foundational
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.38−0.20−0.39−0.16010Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 9.8 · Transitional
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.38−0.18−0.42−0.1806Energy Infrastructure 9.1 · Transitional
Mass displacement S08Low 0.26−0.08−0.23−0.0807Political Institutions & Civic Participation 10.7 · Transitional

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Energy supply shock−0.15−0.90−0.34−0.38−0.38−0.85−1.00−0.97−0.86
Chokepoint closure−0.08−1.02−0.86·−0.46−0.98−0.39−0.78−1.00
Pandemic−0.61−0.31−0.25−0.74−0.65−0.70−0.65−0.64−0.64
Infrastructure collapse−0.69−0.80−0.29−0.29−0.29−0.72−0.67−0.66−0.57
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.59−0.24−0.22·−0.57−0.55−0.57−0.56−0.84
Global financial crisis−0.23−0.23−0.21−0.47−0.47−0.58−0.78−0.67−0.53
AI diffusion shock−0.54−0.23−0.20−0.60−0.45−0.62−0.53−0.29−0.26
Single-supplier cut-off−0.66−0.18−0.23−0.28·−0.57·−0.58−0.58
Sovereign funding crisis−0.03−0.22−0.12−0.30−0.27−0.37−0.45−0.27−0.31
Disaster in the core−0.02−0.47−0.14−0.34−0.16−0.39−0.21−0.16−0.16
Food and water shock−0.02−0.24−0.11−0.29−0.28−0.30−0.14−0.24−0.27
Legitimacy crisis−0.14·−0.29−0.14−0.34−0.47−0.39··
Hybrid campaign−0.14−0.30−0.33·−0.33−0.31·−0.13−0.13
Mass displacement·−0.08−0.06−0.16−0.13−0.18−0.08−0.01·

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Singapore is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+66.567.30.8771Information Environment & Strategic Communication 14.3 · Established
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+55.157.52.45913Energy Technologies 8.8 · Foundational
Great-power détente S18 ↗Gainer+48.855.46.7793Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 14 · Established
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Gainer+44.854.39.4659Energy Infrastructure 9.6 · Transitional
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+36.838.21.46416Energy Infrastructure 9.6 · Transitional
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Gainer+16.724.07.37823Biotechnology & Health Technologies 14.4 · Established
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+16.620.94.36638Energy Infrastructure 9.6 · Transitional
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Gainer+12.117.95.76718Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 10.3 · Transitional
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed+7.310.53.26841Agriculture & Food Infrastructure 10.8 · Transitional
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed0.00.50.567144Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 10.3 · Transitional