Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Latin America and Caribbean · SUR

Suriname

Baseline index 4.04Rank 141 of 197NascentLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Small and exposed. Small states with narrow economies and few buffers. One of 25 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years28.1rank 64 of 197 · 3 years: 28.6
Worst case−23.3%Global financial crisis · tail −22.4%
Opportunity · 10 years−11.6rank 166 of 197 · 3 years: −10.5
Best case+3Sovereign debt reset · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed18%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+1.03expected index points from best practice
Breadth10 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkAdvanced Materials & Manufacturingweakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Global financial crisis, Legitimacy crisis, AI diffusion shock. Highest exposure indicators: industry as a share of gdp; consumer price inflation; youth unemployment rate; adult obesity rate; internet users as a share of population; trade in goods and services relative to gdp; public debt relative to gdp.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Suriname’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Global financial crisis S03High 0.80−0.94−1.14−0.50▼ 820Investment Attraction & Projection 1.7 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.82−0.90−1.03−0.47▼ 723Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Pandemic S14High 0.75−0.88−1.04−0.47▼ 721Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04High 0.61−0.71−0.87−0.38▲ 415Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 1.5 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.61−0.61−0.74−0.33▲ 115Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.82−0.59−0.76−0.35▼ 311Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0.1 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.51−0.55−0.64−0.29012Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.75−0.52−0.62−0.28▼ 316Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.53−0.43−0.58−0.25▲ 211Energy Infrastructure 3.3 · Nascent
Energy supply shock S09Medium 0.38−0.40−0.48−0.21▲ 711Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05Low 0.34−0.33−0.40−0.18▲ 812Joint Command, Projection & Sustainment 0.7 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.47−0.31−0.41−0.18▲ 111Internal Security & Order 5.3 · Nascent
Food and water shock S11Low 0.23−0.24−0.30−0.13▲ 89Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 3.5 · Nascent
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.24−0.22−0.25−0.11▼ 17Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Global financial crisis−0.19−0.49−0.43−0.98−0.98−1.23−1.64−1.40−1.12
Infrastructure collapse−0.23−1.47−0.50−0.53−0.53−1.32−1.23−1.21−1.05
Pandemic−0.23−0.52−0.41−1.25−1.09−1.17−1.09−1.07−1.07
Sovereign funding crisis−0.06−0.60−0.33−0.83−0.74−1.02−1.24−0.74−0.85
AI diffusion shock−0.23−0.38−0.33−1.00−0.75−1.03−0.88−0.48−0.43
Legitimacy crisis−0.19·−0.80−0.46−1.08−1.51−1.24··
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.23−0.33−0.29·−0.76−0.73−0.76−0.74−1.12
Single-supplier cut-off−0.23−0.33−0.40−0.52·−1.05·−1.06−1.06
Disaster in the core−0.03−0.89−0.27−0.66−0.30−0.74−0.40−0.30−0.30
Energy supply shock−0.06−0.56−0.21−0.23−0.23−0.52−0.62−0.60−0.53
Chokepoint closure−0.04−0.55−0.45·−0.25−0.53−0.21−0.42−0.54
Mass displacement·−0.32−0.24−0.64−0.53−0.72−0.31−0.04·
Food and water shock−0.03−0.27−0.12−0.33−0.31−0.34−0.16−0.27−0.31
Hybrid campaign−0.08−0.38−0.39·−0.42−0.39·−0.16−0.16

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Suriname is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+2.56.03.530109Financial Regulation & Integrity 5.3 · Nascent
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed+1.99.07.114128Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Energy abundance S16 ↗Mixed−7.83.911.713149Energy Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed−8.57.916.415136Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed−8.911.620.623188Investment Attraction & Projection 3.7 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed−8.94.012.823167Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 4 · Nascent
Great-power détente S18 ↗Loser−13.28.421.619171Export Capability & Sophistication 3.3 · Nascent
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Loser−16.510.727.116157Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Yield revolution S22 ↗Loser−18.74.323.014180Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−29.15.134.210157Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception